Thursday, 9 October 2014
Evaluation of the preliminary film
Evaluation of the preliminary film
There were many strength and weaknesses that
have been involve din both production and editing of the preliminary film. The
first point I’m going to talk about will be the filming. When it came to the
filming we had a tripod, and a flip camera. The fact we had a tripod came as a
strength to the overall filming as it mean we could take steady clear shots, as
opposed to hot having a tripod and the filming being shaky and disorientated.
However the main weakness with the actual filming side of things would the
quality of the camera we were using. The camera was of an ok quality, however
things such as the microphone on the camera weren’t of the best quality, which
gave the film less of a professional feel.
The next point I’m going to talk about will be
the editing of the film. The editing wasn’t of a very good standard and this
was down to one of many factors. The first and probably most predominant reason
for the lack of quality, would be that no member of the group I was working
with had ever used final cut before, which meant it was new to all of us. This
caused a lack in the overall quality as we were trying to learn the basic
skills at the same time of trying to produce a professional looking film.
However a strength to go with our editing would have been our ability to over
ride parts of the film with a soundtrack. Not only did we incorporate a sound
track, we also were able to make it so the sound fades louder and quieter in
various parts of the film. Having the soundtrack helped us to produce a general
misé en scene as it set the tone for the rest of the film.
Many more factors could have been strengths if
we went further into detain on the actual planning process of the film. The
main weakness with our planning would have been the fact that we didn’t check
what rooms were free and when, so once we used one room on the first day of
filming, we went back on the second day to realise it was being used for a
different. This caused a problem, as the continuity of our film isn’t very good
with the film jumping from one room to another while in the middle of talking.
Also the continuity was a problem in the fact that the main actors were both
wearing different items of clothing the second day as opposed to wearing the
same, which would have caused some confusion and disorientation with the
viewer. However one of the main strength with our planning is that we planned
the shot types and speech, which meant that when it came to the filming we were
able to act efficiently and get the film done at a fast rate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Legally Blonde (2001) Legally blonde is an American romantic comedy release on the 13 th July 2001. The film was produced by MGM...
-
Actress change In the past few weeks we decided as a group to choose a different actress for the opening. This was down to many reasons...
-
Sinister (2012) Sinister is an American mystery horror, originally released on the 12 th of October 2012 in the USA. The film wa...
-
One member of the team curated a number of simple questions along the lines of ‘ what could be improved, in terms of the raw footage presen...
-
Scream (1996) Scream was the first movie of an on going franchise of films, totalling at 4 as of 2011. ‘scream’ , the original, wa...
-
Today out team got together and discussed where we found we were going wrong, because upon looking back on the past couple of weeks, we...
-
Soundtrack We began looking for an ideal soundtrack that we would be able to use in our opening. We had a rough idea...
-
Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 (2010) Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows (Part 1) is the 7 th installment i...